home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Hi -
-
- I have to confess that my of my knowledge of network management protocols
- and MIBs is limited to a general notion that these are A Good Thing and what I
- see in IETF traffic. Unfortunately, the latter tends to be infared -- much
- heat but little light.
-
- IMAP is a little bit different from P7 and POP, although they're widely
- perceived as being the same class of protocols. Although IMAP can be used to
- retrieve mail from a message store ala P7 and POP, it's really a lot more than
- this. To be honest, there's really no reason not to go with POP if all you
- want to do is snarf messages from a maildrop.
-
- IMAP can be thought of as a remote procedure call mechanism for a mail
- UA; that is, it is a mechanism to distribute the job of a UA. I'm not sure
- how much of that class of function is ameniable to management.
-
- As for the issue of a Message Store MIB, remember that the role of a
- message store is different in POP/P7 from IMAP. In POP/P7, it is a maildrop
- for new mail; a staging area in a store-and-forward model. In IMAP, it is the
- place where the user's email bits are located. So, any MIB has to consider
- the differing needs of these two models. [Actually, the IMAP model is quite
- general and most IMAPware supports bits on a local disk as well as on a
- server, so that is an argument for a single general case MIB.]
-
- I also wonder how this would fit in with what our friends at CMU are
- working on with IMSP (the multi-server support protocol; it is to IMAP servers
- what IMAP is to IMAP folders). I admit that I'm way out of my depth here, so
- I'll probably shut up now and start listening.
-
- -- Mark --
-
-
-
-